READ AND DECIDE FOR YOUR SELF WHATS RIGHT AND WHATS WRONG


DIRECT-TO-HOME SATELLITE TV
- Facts You Should Know -

CONSUMERS

Protect your investment: Make sure your reception equipment and programming services are legal.

DEALERS

Protect yourselves: Don't break the law!


* * *

Protecting Canadian Rights

Distribution rights are sold by territory. A Canadian distributor who has purchased those rights suffers financial loss if a U.S. signal is illegally decoded in Canada. Likewise, the subscriber base for Canadian DTH distribution undertakings is significantly diminished if Canadians subscribe to unauthorized American DTH services. Canada's Radiocommunication Act contains provisions to protect the rights of these Canadian broadcasting service providers. There are penalties for breaking the law which include fines and, in some cases, jail terms.

* * *

The "Grey Market"

Under Canadian law, viewers may not use decoding equipment to watch programming purchased from anyone but the lawful distributor -- a person who has the lawful right in Canada to transmit an encoded signal and to authorize its decoding.

"Grey market" reception occurs when a decoder that is authorized to decode a signal in a programming service's legitimate market territory (the United States) is used to decode the signals in another territory (Canada).

Sometimes, Canadian dealers might offer to set up subscriptions with U.S. satellite service providers. Viewers--who might believe, or be told, that such subscriptions are legitimate--may be asked to provide a U.S. address, or have one provided for them. This is a sure tip-off that the service is not legal.

American DTH service providers do not have the lawful right in Canada to authorize the decoding of their programming.

Retailers who distribute "grey market" programming are aiding and abetting consumers to decode DTH signals that are not authorized for distribution in Canada and thereby putting themselves at legal risk.

Dealers should know that it is illegal to import, manufacture or sell equipment used to decode signals provided by someone other than the lawful distributor.

* * *

The Black Market

Computer pirates create illegal decoding equipment for sale to consumers. Illegally modified decoders, and pirate access cards, enable viewers to watch programming without paying lawful distributors. Retailers cannot legally sell such equipment, and everyone involved -- pirate, retailer and purchaser -- could be charged with a criminal offence.

Don't Get Stuck With an Expensive Bird Bath

Consumers who use questionable methods to obtain signals to which they are not entitled are on shaky ground: financially, technically and legally. The equipment used to illegally decode U.S. signals is expensive--yet it comes with no guarantee that it can do the job, or can continue to do the job, for which it was purchased.

Broadcasters are continually upgrading their scrambling technologies, so illegal and expensive decoders can become obsolete in an instant. At any moment, American service providers could cut off their signals to viewers in territories where they do not hold programming distribution rights. And fly-by-night Canadian operators could quickly fold their businesses and disappear--again, leaving consumers holding the bag.

Needless to say, those operating in the black or grey markets do not offer guarantees with their merchandise or services. Consumers who think they are getting a deal by using such equipment or services have no protection at all.

* * *

Protect Yourself

Consumers should ask retailers if their equipment and services are legal, and make sure that their service providers are lawful distributors of programming.

Dealers and distributors should be aware of the law.


The law provides for both criminal prosecution and civil action by private parties whose financial interests are affected by illegal decoding.

* * *

If In Doubt, Find Out

Industry Canada has responsibility for the Radiocommunication Act. For more information, please contact your Industry Canada District Office. You will find the number in the Government of Canada pages of the telephone directory.


This page is intended to provide a quick reference to the applications of the Radiocommunication Act to direct-to-home satellite broadcasting. Those seeking further assistance should refer to the full text of the Act, contact Industry Canada, or seek legal advice.


>

DTH use illegal, Ottawa warns

Canadians could face charges


By Harvey Enchin and Geoffrey Rowan

The Globe and Mail

November 14, 1996



Hundreds of thousands of Canadians using satellite-receiving equipment to obtain U.S. television services may be breaking the law and could face criminal charges, Industry Canada warns.

In a brochure issued yesterday on direct-to-home satellite TV, the government has made it clear for the first time that it considers the so-called grey market to be illegal.

Industry watchers estimate that as many as 200,000 Canadians are receiving grey market TV services.

On the grey market, television services are purchased outside the territory for which they are authorized for distribution. For example, a Canadian can only buy Home Box Office on the grey market because it is not authorized for distribution in Canada by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. Canadian rights to HBO programming may be held by others, such as The Movie Network or SuperChannel, which have paid to broadcast this programming to their subscribers.

"Canada's Radiocommunication Act contains provisions to protect the rights of these Canadian broadcasting service providers," the brochure says. "There are penalties for breaking the law, which include fines and, in some cases, jail terms."

The Canadian broadcasting industry has lobbied heavily to shut down the grey market. It has filed lawsuits to stop retailers from distributing the small satellite dishes and digital systems that enable Canadian consumers to pull in the TV services. But in the face of obvious demand, and with a Canadian alternative perhaps still years away from the market, the government has, until now, maintained a relatively low profile.

The publication of the brochure follows last week's call by Industry Minister John Manley for applications for a direct broadcast satellite to provide the infrastructure for Canadian DTH services when they are launched.

The CRTC has licensed three DTH operators but none has been able to launch a service.

"Anything that contributes to greater public education on the subject is, I think, a welcome step on the government's part," said Lisa de Wilde, president of TMN Networks Inc., which operates The Movie Network. "The point is to do as much as we can now before a Canadian service launches to make sure there is a market the Canadian service can occupy."

TMN was part of a group, which also included Allarcom Pay Television Ltd., The Family Channel and ExpressVu Inc., a Canadian licensed DTH service, that launched a legal action against satellite equipment retailers.

The government brochure gives the group more ammunition to wage its court battle.

"Retailers who distribute grey market programming are aiding and abetting consumers to decode DTH signals that are not authorized for distribution in Canada and thereby putting themselves at legal risk," the brochure says.

"Under Canadian law, viewers may not use decoding equipment to watch programming purchased from anyone but the lawful distributor--a person who has the lawful right in Canada to transmit an encoded signal and to authorize its decoding," the brochure continues.

"Sometimes, Canadian dealers might offer to set up subscriptions with U.S. satellite service providers. Viewers--who might believe, or be told, that such subscriptions are legitimate--may be asked to provide a U.S. address, or have one provided for them. This is a sure tip-off that the service is not legal."

The brochure also says the black market, where equipment is modified to receive signals without payments to distributors, is a criminal offence for everyone involved--retailers, users and those modifying the equipment.

Entitled Direct-To-Home Satellite TV--Facts You Should Know, it will be distributed to dealers, retailers and importers and distributors of U.S. DTH equipment, the government said in a news release. It is also available at Industry Canada offices and on the Internet (http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/OCA/).

Ironically, the government's stern words about the legal status of the grey market come weeks after a New Brunswick court ruled that a search and seizure of satellite equipment by the RCMP earlier this year was a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The case was dismissed and the judgment obliged the RCMP to return the confiscated equipment to the retailer.


OTTAWA out on legal limb over DTH TV

ANALYSIS / Some say the government is usurping the courts when it says those who buy U.S. grey market service are breaking the law.

By GEOFFREY ROWAN
And HARVEY ENCHIN
The Globe and Mail
November 18/96

The Canadian government has stepped into a legal quagmire by declaring that Canadians who view grey market U.S. satellite television services could face criminal charges and jail time.

It's a quagmire because, despite a brochure approved by Industry Minister John Manley that purports to tell consumers and retailers "facts you should know" about direct-to-home satellite TV, DTH legality remains undetermined.

That legal uncertainty has police agencies confused and frustrated as they try to enforce laws that are under attack in the courts.

On Canada's grey market, viewers use a U.S. mailing address to subscribe to U.S. TV services not authorized for distribution here by the Canadian Radio-televsion and Telecommunications Commission.

A black market also exists in the form of cards with embedded microprocessors, that enable people to pull in satellite programming without paying anything to anyone in any territory.

Black or grey, legal or not, there is a tremendous demand in Canada for the broadcast services.

It's estimated that more than 200,000 Canadians watch grey market TV programming, with more signing up every day in the absence of a legal Canadian alternative.

RCMP sources say Canada has become an international supplier of the black market access cards, but wouldn't estimate how many Canadians use them.

Indeed, to some DTH supporters, Mr. Manley's announcement appears to be timed to kill the Christmas market for the small satellite dish systems that are springing up across Canada.

To some in the legal community, Mr. Manley's warning to Canadians that they are breaking the law looks like an attempt to usurp the role of the courts, which have several issues before them on various aspects of the legality of Canadian use of the U.S. TV services.

"If I'm a trial judge and I have issues before me and I read in the paper that the Industry Minister has made a statement about those issues, I can't help but be influenced by that," said one member of the legal community.

That's not the case here, said Len St. Aubin, telecommunications policy analyst for Industry Canada.

"There's an important distinction to be made here between advising Canadians of what the law says, and on a particular case that's working its way through the courts," Mr. St. Aubin said. "The pamphlet does not comment on a particular case that's before the court. The pamphlet describes what the law says."

Perhaps, but ultimately it is the courts that will decide what the law means.

So far, in rulings on issues that have been made, the courts haven't been willing or able to come down hard on grey marketers, or even on seemingly more nefarious black marketers.

A New Brunswick court ruled recently that a search and seizure of satellite equipment by the RCMP this year was a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The case was dismissed and the judgement forced the RCMP to return the confiscated equipment to the retailer.

The RCMP executed several search warrants last June in British Columbia , Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and in the Maritimes in an effort to shut down the production of access cards.

But the Mounties have not been able to lay any charges as a result of those searches and seizures. The laying of charges has been held up while the courts settle various legal issues relating to the admissibility of the seized material.

If those issues aren't settled quickly, or if the RCMP is not able to get an extension, it will soon have to return all the material it seized.

Last June 26, the RCMP in New Brunswick raided Satellite Services & Programming Inc. in Moncton, and four other satellite equipment dealers in Sussex, Woodstock, Fredericton and Miramichi. "They walked in and grabbed $30,000 worth of merchandise, our computers and books and essentially put us out of business," said William Mitton, owner and president of the company.

The dealers hired a lawyer and went to court Sept. 3 to reclaim their goods. Mr. Justice H. H. McLellan of the Court of Queen's Bench ruled that the RCMP raid violated the dealers' "right to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure" under the Charter and ordered the RCMP to return the merchandise within seven days.

The RCMP appealed the decision but the higher court upheld the earlier judgment.

Only then did the RCMP charge the dealers under one section of the Criminal Code and one section of the Radiocommunications Act, which cover the theft of telecommunications services, possession of decrypt ion devices and protection of the rights of broadcasting service providers.

"I can't break a law," Mr. Mitton said last week. "There's no law to break. I'm prepared to go to trial."

The court date is set for Feb. 10 and the Crown seems apprehensive. It has dropped the Criminal Code charges , which relate to telecommunications theft, and tried to coax mr. Mitton to plead guilty to charges under the Radiocommunications Act. If he did, Crown attorneys promised, his fine would be $400 to $600 and the company's penalty would be under $1,000. Mr. Mitton told them to forget it.

The plea bargain worked in Woodstock, where a small dealer, anxious to be free of the legal problems, agreed to plead guilty in exchange for a minimal fine of $200.

"We told him not to do it," Mr. Mitton said. "Even the judge asked him if he was sure he wanted to plead guilty."

Across the country, the Crown's legal victories have been negotiated guilty pleas in exchange for reduced fines. There have been no definitive ruling on the merits of the charges.

"They're scared of getting into court with this thing," Mr. Mitton said. "I never ran away from anything I felt I was right on."

A definitive ruling, or at least a step closer to one, may be coming soon.

On Nov. 28, the Federal Court of Canada in Toronto is scheduled to decide a number of issues of U.S. DTH service in Canada.

The case is ExpressVu Inc. and others versus NII Norsat International Inc. and others. Mississauga based ExpressVu filed suit to stop a group of equipment dealers, including Norsat, from selling their DTH products in Canada.

The defendants are asking the court to dismiss the case on the grounds that distributing DTH equipment is not illegal and that whether Canadians can use a U.S. address is not an issue of Canadian law. They also argue in their court filings that Canadian residents have the right to free expression, including the right to receive broadcasting.

A judicial ruling in their favour on any of those issues could torpedo Mr. Manley's efforts to slow the spread of the grey market.

The RCMP in Nova Scotia said they didn't know about Mr. Manley's pamphlet on Wednesday when they executed search warrants at four locations, seizing $250,000 of what they say are illegal satellite systems and access cards.

Constable Mike Furey said he expects four individuals to be charged under the Radiocommunications Act and the Criminal Code. He said he's confident these searches and seizures will stand up. "Our searches were very specific and very limited. We're hoping the charges will be laid (this) week and we'll put it before the court."

Sergeant David Long of the RCMP's commercial crimes unit in Vancouver said it's critical that these issues be resolved.

"The fact is this is probably the first indication we don't have sovereignty of our broadcasting, and we may not have sovereignty of our own broadcasting in the future because there is no way you can put up a wall from here to the moon to keep (U.S. satellite TV) out.

"We've got to have some mechanism to keep it out, otherwise we won't be able to sustain your own broadcast industry.





Back Next